
WEARING THE SANDALS OF THE SANHEDRIN – Jan. 26
January 26, 2013“If we let him go on like this, everyone will believe in him, and the Romans will come and take away both our place and our nation.” John 11:48
Consider if you were a member of the Great Sanhedrin during the Roman occupation of Israel. The Romans were the sole superpower of the time. They were masters of subjecting other countries. You don’t conquer the known world without learning the skills of maintaining such an empire.

English: Español: Trabajo propio. Máxima extensión del Imperio Romano. Superpuesto en un mapa físico. Deutsch: (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
When the Romans conquered a people, they granted some ruling authority to the locals for one primary purpose. The restlessness of a conquered people could be abated when it appeared that they were ruled and judged by their own people. That policy of limited self-rule effectively kept the peace in subservient providences for centuries.
That was the situation during the time of Christ. Both Herod and the Sanhedrin had jobs allowed by the Romans with the primary purpose of keeping the people from rebelling against Roman rule. If they could not do that, then the Romans would go to “plan B,” which was to get someone else or do it themselves.
Israel was a rebellious brew that always threatened to spill over. It was the job of the Sanhedrin to keep it under control and they did a very good job for many years. However, they had a monumental failure. Their failure to beat down rebellious fervor resulted in exactly what they had feared about Jesus – “the Romans will come and take away both our place and our nation”.
They were absolutely right.
In 66 AD, a growing movement got away from these guardians of Roman rule and flourished into open, armed rebellion. The rebellious Jews were actually able to push the occupying Romans out, for a while. That was until Titus and his armies showed up.
Rebellions are a serious problem in empires. An empire cannot tolerate even one rebellion for fear that it might spread. The Romans knew that. Therefore, Roman treatment of the Jewish rebellion in 70 AD was a message to all those other conquered peoples in the empire.
It was brutal.
Israel was never the same after the Romans got done with Jerusalem. The chief priests and Pharisees concerns about the Romans taking away both their place and their nation had become a reality. Jerusalem wasn’t even called Jerusalem for 200 years. The center of Jewish society, the temple, was gone; the sacrificial system was gone; the Sadducees were gone.
How could they have been so absolutely right and so absolutely wrong at the same time?
The Sadducees and the Pharisees were being pragmatic when dealing with Jesus. They were considering the practical consequences of the nation following after this Carpenter. They knew what the Romans could do. They were right about what the Romans would do. History showed that they were right. The pragmatic solution was to sacrifice a single life so that the entire society would survive, albeit still in bondage. That was better than what happened in 70 AD.
Their problem was that they did not consider all the practical consequences regarding Jesus of Nazareth. They only considered the practical consequences within this physical world. They did not consider the implications of Jesus being who he claimed to be.
Once you believe Jesus’ claims, you have a game changing variable – GOD. God is a player in all that we do, whether we acknowledge that or not. The potential, practical consequences of different actions and inactions in this life are changed when you consider God. There are clearly impossible consequences in this world. Yet, the impossible is possible when you remember that God is for you.
“For nothing is impossible with God.” (Luke 1:37)
When you consider God in your decisions, you will find that everything gets turned upside down.
The Pharisees tried to save their lives and their nation and ended up losing both.
Jesus told us that, “For whoever would save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for my sake and the gospel’s will save it.” (Mark 6:35)
What was the difference? – GOD
The Pharisees were willing to violate the law and condemn an individual so that they would live in bondage.
Jesus was willing to sacrifice himself to free the nation, “and not for the nation only, but also to gather into one the children of God who are scattered abroad.” (John 11:51) –
What was the difference? – GOD
We must always remember to look beyond the practical consequences of this world and realize that none of those consequences stand when God is for us.
With God, there is nothing that is impossible.
PRAYER: Lord, thank you for reminding me that nothing is too hard for you. Thank you for being all powerful and sovereign over everything. Father, forgive me for those times when I don’t trust you or logic is used to cover a lack of faith. Lord, teach me to lean on you; instruct me on how to trust you in all things. Show me the balance between wisdom and blind obedience; between testing you and having trust in you. Amen
this is a fascinating blog!
It’s unexplainable apart from God! When we live open to God’s guidance we will find ourselves doing the unexplainable… But for God!
Thanks,
David
Jesus said, as recorded in John (17:20,21) “Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on me through their word; That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us: that the world may believe that thou hast sent me.” I appreciate your thoughtful reply to Leo and am grateful for your blog.
Wonderful application. I would suggest that factoring God into our decisions is part of the true cost of discipleship.
I think that you are absolutely correct.
God Bless!
JD
You have taught me something new today. Thank you for your insight. You have a new subscriber :-).
That is awesome. Thanks for commenting and following. That is so encouraging.
God Bless!
JD
[…] Continued here: WEARING THE SANDALS OF THE SANHEDRIN – Jan. 26 « A … […]
This theme keeps recurring…I did not go into as much detail in my sermon, but it is a key concept behind Peter’s denial, and Judas’ betrayal. (Your last offering prompted me to post that sermon on my blog…we should meet and compare notes sometime!)
I am glad that you reposted that sermons. I was greatly encouraged by it. We are called to follow God. It is not a suggestion or a helpful tip but and imperative – You Must follow me. Such a good reminder.
God Bless!
JD
Interesting, but I am not a believer in god making things happen.People should believe in themselves to get things done,handing decisions over to blind faith is a recipe for disaster.Most deaths have been caused through organised religion.We started with Crusades in the middle East, now we have radical Muslims causing world terrorism. Who is correct in their assumption of which is the true religion. It`s all up to ones individual interpretation.
You stated that you are not a believer in God making things happen. The God of the Bible is pretty clearly represented as a God who makes things happen. I am interested to know what you do believe about God.
Please allow me to respectfully discussion your assertion that “most deaths have been caused through organized religion.” I think that you may have made your assertion too broad and overstated it. I hope that you will agree that disease and natural causes have killed far more people than any religious cause. I realize that is probably not your point and I don’t want to tritely treat you statement. I believe your point is that religion is the cause of most violence of one people against man. Please correct me if I am wrong.
That is also a point that I am not willing to concede. History is replete with examples of one people group committing extreme violence against other people long before Islam or Christianity were ever in existence. That behavior did not start with either of those religions. A brief list of conquering people groups such as the Greek empire, the Persian empire, the Roman empire, the Assyrians, the Babylonians, the Egyptians. In every one of those cases there were some pretty horrible examples of the mistreatment of other people. All of those empires were created based on very much death. I will grant that religion in some form existed during those periods but violence of men against other men did not originate in Christianity or Islam.
There is an implication in your statement that I believe that you are intending – remove religion and violence will go away. I don’t believe that is true. Consider the last 100 years. More “death” and human rights violations have been caused by atheistic governments (Soviet Union, Cambodia, China, Nazi Germany, etc.) than any other “religious” country. Religion is not the problem; people are the problem.
All you have to do is look at history to see that this world is broken. It is men who manipulate religion and non-religion systems to perpetrate very great evil. Christianity is the only religion where God makes something happen to solve the fundamental problem of this broken world – the sin of man. God had to do something because we clearly can’t do it ourselves. God sent his Son, Jesus Christ, to solve the very problem that you are asserting religion is the cause of – sin.
The way you will know which one is true is to investigate. Check out Jesus’ claims and all of the prophecy that is fulfilled by is life. It is not up to an interpretation. I challenge you to investigate what the Bible has to say.
Thanks for visiting. I’ll be in prayer with you. Amen.
You are very welcome and thank you for stopping by my blog.
God Bless!
JD
It’s amazing to see the ironies and providence of God–of how He gets things done that often times those who think they are the movers and shakers of history are doing it for themselves but then fulfill a greater purpose.
Amen!
very interesting information…….thanks for sharing!
You are very welcome. Thanks for visiting.
God Bless!
JD